ON THE RANCH 513 June 29

ON THE RANCH 514 July 6 2007 #2

 

California Has Been Sold

Yes, you heard it right. Governor Schwarzenegger and the California Legislature has sold the state with the fifth largest economy in the world, to the Indian tribes who demanded a huge expansion to their slot machine numbers despite surrounding communities opposition. There has been a surprising amount of press surrounding this issue indicating concern, even on the part of some legislators who have stated publicly that there are absolutely no vehicles in place to verify whether the tribes are actually paying the state the percentages they have promised. In fact, there are studies that have been out for some time which show clearly that previous claims of payments to the state have been greatly exaggerated. The payments promised never materialized and no one paid attention. The fact that at least some of the legislators cared enough about the economy affecting all Californians to talk about the lack of verifiability of the proposed compacts was hopeful. It was hopeful until they then just voted for it anyway. I am outraged that these people dare to call themselves our “representatives”. They certainly do not represent my interests nor, I believe, do they represent the residents of this Valley except for the tribal members here. I think we have, once again, been sold down the proverbial river in exchange for cash to support the state’s bloated budget. I’m beginning to feel like I’m being held hostage in my own home. My crime was to love this Valley as my grandmother did. I fear for its future and I fear for rural communities all over this country who are suffering, as we are, from the sudden influx of traffic and crime due to casinos in their once quiet valleys. How did this happen?

 

Alternative Fuels or Are They?

There has been a lot of discussion and considerable pressure from certain segments of the community to wean ourselves from oil products and move towards “alternative” fuels such as solar, wind and ethanol. Although I believe the United States, including California could provide a large part of our oil, so-called environmentalists have, for the last thirty years, prevented the development of adequate refining facilities, even if we would have the political will to drill our own oil which we don’t. Lessening our dependence on foreign oil is certainly a critical goal, but the related availability of domestic oil must be pursued immediately.

The discussions surrounding the topics of solar and wind energy have been equally politicized to our detriment. I have some experience with solar since I have a house which is entirely dependent on solar energy. What I have found out about it is disturbing since some people proclaim that this is the solution for the future. It is very expensive. It is so expensive that a 1200 square foot house takes approximately $50,000 to $75,000  to install an adequate system which, when there are two or more days of cloud cover or rain, fails and does not cover air conditioning. Solar heating water is pretty “ify” at times as well. So too, wind power is something that is geographically restricted. Some locations are blessed with breezes on a constant basis but whether it is enough to power your house or not is a question. It is really too bad that some people who are ignorant about the facts keep saying that all we need to do is switch to these “environmentally-friendly” methods. It isn’t as simple as that. I wish it were because it is a wonderful feeling to know that the sun or wind can power your life. The technology is still not there. Even some of the biggest or loudest environmental legislators who have wind farms proposed in their areas are fighting them tooth and nail. What hypocrisy!

 

The Repercussions of Ethanol

There are different issues with ethanol. I have friends who think that this is THE answer to air quality and foreign oil questions; a two-for-one kind of solution. Unfortunately, there are some unforeseen problems that should have been explored by people who had the qualifications to understand the repercussions of major agricultural changes. Because most of these things are proposed by people who have no clue what they are talking about and, usually, the public doesn’t have the proper information to know potential consequences of these changes, they go along with the new ideas because they sound good. Here is some information for you to ponder before you support ethanol as the preferred fuel. Raising corn, which is what ethanol is made from will have and is already having the following negative impacts: (1) food prices will rise; riots in Mexico have occurred because the price of corn has made tortillas too expensive for many people, (2) livestock producers will have to find something else to feed their animals in feedlots raising prices on all meat,  (3) it takes MORE water which we don’t have to produce this amount of corn than other fuels, and (4) if we planted corn in every corner of the United States where it would grow to the exclusion of any other crop, we still would not be able to grow enough to supply the demand of this country. Anyone with agricultural experience knows, as well, that monoculture (growing only one crop) tends to invite pests and other organisms which will quickly destroy that crop and the ability to grow it there for some time to come.

 

So what is the answer to our foreign oil dependence?

I, for one, do not want to continue financing countries who have such disdain for us who harbor people who want to kill us and destroy our culture but how do we convince those in our community who consistently pressure legislators to prevent any local development which would relieve this dependence? I know that those of you who have to commute every day to work ponder this topic frequently, so what do you think?

 

Confusion

I get more and more confused about what some people believe. I heard on the news the other day something about some cities, mostly bigger than what we have here in Santa Barbara County, requiring businesses to build outside shelters, water fountains and bathrooms for illegal aliens to hang out in while they are waiting for work. I’m sure that everybody has seen places where these people gather. It is in so-called “sanctuary” cities where government officials have chosen to ignore the law that this is occurring. These same officials, and I use the term loosely, are now requiring businesses to violate Federal law. I believe this constitutes some level of anarchy, and perhaps any Federal funds should be withheld from those cities until they uphold the laws they have sworn to defend. What a horrible example they are setting for not just our children but all members of society. I also feel that these people can and should be removed from office and never allowed to hold public office again since they clearly cannot perform their duties. I’m not sure whether they should be prosecuted for breaking the law or not but it surely requires public discussion. I support one’s freedom to believe whatever one wants to, but as a person charged with upholding the law and trying to force local businesses to break the law, this is intolerable.

 

Society, History, and Education

I write periodically about what is being taught to our children which will color how they view history and the future of society. I am becoming increasingly alarmed with what I am hearing about the secular progressive agenda being taught in many schools these days from early grammar school through university levels. I have mentioned the grandchild of a local rancher coming home with a writing assignment to explain why cows are bad for the environment and how horrified she was that her grandchildren were being taught these lies.

The Santa Ynez Valley has been an agricultural area for as long as people have been here. Many people have been here for multiple generations either in agriculture directly or some business which supports it. The vistas that still exist today are primarily due to private landowners who have chosen to continue the tradition of agriculture rather than sell out to developers. This is not an easy decision as estate taxes (which will be further discussed in the future) and anti-agriculture regulations often make decisions for the farmers and ranchers. Most people are not aware of how devastating some of these rules crafted by people who are ignorant of the constraints of agriculture are.

This history, which is a great source of pride for many, has numerous facets to it. Depending on whether one is a farmer or rancher, there are different things one treasures. For example, in this very area, a revered type of horsemanship was practiced which today’s Reined Cow Horse community emulates. Talented cowboys in this region, working with cattle, developed not only techniques but also equipment for the horses which, over a course of years, trained the cow horses to be able to move, control and help doctor cattle as needed. Over the years the horse is introduced to the snaffle bit first, then the hackamore, the two-rein and finally the full bridle horse emerges. Talented artisans developed saddles, rawhide braiding, horsehair ropes and special bits (one named the Santa Barbara bit) all of which was part of the training of the horse to do the work needed.

The historical values of these things are integral to what the Valley is today. It is an enormous resource that many newcomers are not even aware of although they are surrounded by it everyday. Some in our community would denigrate the practice of farming and ranching which brings food to their table, clothes on their back and medicines to keep them alive. Some of these same people are educating our children as we speak to not value these people’s contributions and, to the contrary, are teaching them ideas which are directly contradictory to what we know to be true. Why are we allowing this? Since when has it been the school’s choice to teach mangled history and values? Why is there almost no education provided explaining the importance of agriculture to everybody? Is there an agenda being followed here and is it something we want our children to absorb or would we rather have more control over what our children believe to be true? It is a question of our future.