For the past several years, I have questioned the Board of Supervisors each and every time they have renewed a contract with Marborg for trash service in the Cuyama Valley

COMMENTARY

For the past several years I have questioned the Board of Supervisors each and every time they have renewed a contract with Marborg for trash service in the Cuyama Valley. Don’t get me wrong, Marborg has a great reputation in our community and in the industry. I am not questioning the work the company does or the rate it charges. It is the logistics of the operation that has me baffled.

 

Marborg is a trash hauler in the South County. The company sends a truck to the Cuyama Valley on a regular basis and hauls the trash to the county’s Tajiguas Landfill located several miles west of Goleta. What I have asked each and every year are two questions pertaining to this operation. 

 

First, why doesn’t the county have Marborg dump the trash at a landfill or transfer station closer to Cuyama?, thus eliminating the cost of hauling the trash all the way to Tajiguas. The second question I ask is, why are North County ratepayers alone underwriting the entire cost of the operation?

 

The fact is there are at least three disposal sites closer to Cuyama than the Tajiguas landfill. There is a landfill in Taft, a transfer station in Nipomo and a landfill in Santa Maria. Each and every year, county staff would defend the program in the following manner. They would dismiss the Taft and Nipomo options due to their concern about dumping trash outside of our county, citing the fear that our county could somehow get dragged into issues involving closure of the landfills utilized by these operators. They also dismiss the Nipomo and Santa Maria landfills as charging more per ton than does the county landfill.  These arguments never held sway with me because with respect to closure concerns, the county does not own the Santa Maria landfill, yet it dumps trash there. With respect to cost comparisons, the difference in the fee to dump was minimal compared to the cost of hauling the trash from one end of the county to the other.

 

Staff never did come up with a good rationale as to why they collectively charge all North County ratepayers a cumulative extra $200,000 per year to subsidize the cost of the Cuyama contract. They simply would repeat the dilemma they are in with respect to how the Cuyama rates are set. In a nutshell, most county residents pay between $30 and $40 per month for trash service. Cuyama residents have a locked in fee of $77 per year! And that rate can’t be changed without a vote of the people! I have always questioned why ratepayers are forced to subsidize Cuyama trash service versus the Board of Supervisors taking the money out of the General Fund?

 

Well, this is going to be the last year I raise a stink over this issue. That is because I finally received an answer to the questions I have been posing. The sad fact is I didn’t get the answer from county staff or a county supervisor.  County staff wasn’t talking and the Board of Supervisors were in the dark. I got the answer I was looking for from Marborg. I was enlightened to the fact that the costs of the program cited during all these years I have been complaining did not include the $71,000 cost of disposal at Tajiguas. That is because nobody is directly being charged for the disposal costs. Now, I know the real reason it is cheaper for the county to haul the trash all the way there. And, since the entire operation at Tajiguas is paid for by South County ratepayers, in essence, a portion of the costs are being spread countywide.

 

Andy Caldwell is the Executive Director of COLAB and a 39-year resident of the Central Coast. Contact information is available at the COLAB website at www.colabsbc.org