OBEY THE LAW, OR NOT?
In Santa Barbara County government obeying the law appears to be a
matter of political expediency.
At an Aug. 21, 2007 Board of Supervisors’ hearing on State Housing Mandates,
Chairman of the Board, Brooks Firestone, declared that as a Supervisor he took
an oath of office to obey the law. He exhorted the county and its citizens to
obey the law.
Despite this alleged affinity for obeying the law, one week later the
Board of Supervisors elected not to obey the law in response to a Grand Jury report
on the deleterious effects of immigration on the county. In doing so, the Board
of Supervisors tried to excuse its refusal to act as not being empowered to
make immigration policy, which is solely within the purview of the federal
government. That was pure obfuscation since the issue before the board was not
one of making immigration policy but one of simply enforcing the law.
Evidently, the Board of Supervisors considers itself above complying
with federal laws, including the immigrations laws.
The report before the board on Aug. 28 was a product of the 2006-2007 County
Grand Jury. The Grand Jury is composed of county citizens, who volunteer a year
of their lives and many hundreds of hours, to investigate important local
issues and make recommendations to the Board of Supervisors. This aspect of the
Grand Jury function serves as an important check and balance on county
government, with the laudable goal of achieving better governance.
The Grand Jury, in a thoughtful, well-researched report, sought to
present a balanced and constructive assessment of the social and economic
impacts of immigration on
The Grand Jury began by recognizing that there is no accurate count of
the number of illegal immigrants residing in the county or those who utilize
public services. Without an understanding of the true population of illegal
immigrants in the county, it is impossible for the county to adequately plan
for infrastructure and public services.
The number of illegal immigrants is unknown because county departments,
while they have the absolute legal right to inquire as to legal residency
status when people apply for county services, elect not to do so. (U. S. Immigration & Nationality Act, Title 8, Chapter 14,
sub-chapter IV, section 1644). County departments can also verify legal
residency through the federal Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements computer
data system (SAVE). Nevertheless, without any accountability, county departments
choose in many instances to not0 determine legal residency or eligibility.
While many counties across the
The impact on housing is among the areas touched upon in the Grand Jury
report. Not surprisingly, a consequence of the huge influx of illegal
immigrants to
The State Housing Mandates for
However, we don’t know for certain what these numbers are based upon
because the County of Santa Barbara has done nothing to inquire, let alone legally
contest, the exorbitant number of houses mandated for the County of Santa
Barbara by the state.
A recent audit of the county’s Affordable Housing Program revealed substantial
fraud in that program. Among the fraudulent acts revealed are that illegal
immigrants, though not qualified to receive taxpayer subsidized housing, nevertheless
applied for and received such units. To date the county has not revealed
whether it has taken any steps to correct this fraud on the taxpayers or to
enforce the law.
The Grand Jury report also reveals alarming impacts on health care,
educational, social services and law enforcement in the county. Given
escalating gang violence, reappearance of infectious diseases, over-crowding
and the immense burdens placed on schools and health services by illegal
immigration, the Board of Supervisors owed the public a more thoughtful and
responsible consideration of the Grand Jury’s hard work.
So much for the board’s professed devotion to the rule of law and its
duty to the law abiding residents of