From the Desk of Bill Cirone

 

P.O.L.O. is continually getting input from the community that implies it does not understand tribal gambling and land expansion issues because they are so complicated.  We are told that people only have a very short attention span and we must make things very, very simple.  This seems very sad.  If you love this Valley, you will need to invest a little time and energy into understanding the issues. 

So here is a start for those of you with little time and little energy.

 

This could be our future: Foxwoods Casino and Resort, in beautiful, rural Ledyard Connecticut. The population of Ledyard is 14, 687. Foxwoods, an Indian casino founded in 1983 as a bingo hall, is now the largest casino in the world.

 

If that is all the time you have to read this, you know enough.  The picture should be worth 1000 words.

 

If you have another 20 seconds, here are some basic facts:

• Reservations are land held “in trust” by     the federal government.

 

• Indian tribes are considered dependent nations.

 

• Tribal governments on reservations can have casinos.

 

• The Chumash Casino makes around $250 million a year.

 

• Casinos make hundreds of millions of dollars and are self regulated.

 

• Indian gaming is a nation-wide, $27 billion industry.

 

• Businesses, including casinos, on land in trust are not subject to all of the local and state rules and laws that you and I have to follow.

 

• There are about 565 of these separate governments in the United States.  There are many more tribes trying to become federally recognized.

 

• These tribal governments have their own constitutions and their own government leadership.  That leadership is often determined by a family that is a controlling majority.

 

• Across the state and country, tribal members are being disenrolled from the tribe if they disagree with the current tribal government, or for any reason the tribal government determines.  

 

• Many of these tribal governments have their own tribal court system.  Some have their own police force.

 

• California voters passed proposition 1A to allow a limited number of slot machines to help impoverished Indian tribes.

 

• Local and state governments across the country are now using gambling dollars to balance their budgets.

 

• These tribal governments demand to negotiate directly with the County and State governments.  The public is not any part of negotiations and may be denied any information about the negotiations.

 

Worried?  Thinking that communities that have casinos don’t seem to have much say in tribal gambling and land expansion?  Tribal police force?  Have another 30 seconds?

 

In countless different situations, Supervisors Salud Carbajal, Joni Gray, and Joseph Centeno have been very outspoken in their support of the Santa Ynez Band, even to the extent of stating that the County should consult with Chairman Vincent Armenta before taking action.   Supervisor Janet Wolf appears to be supportive, but she is new so time will tell.  Supervisor Brooks Firestone has voiced opposition to tribal gambling and land expansion.  He has also said there is nothing he can do about it.

 

Currently, what are your chances of getting your elected politicians in Santa Barbara County to oppose tribal gambling, tribal land expansion, and tribalism in the Santa Ynez Valley?

 

None.

 

Worried?  Got another 20 seconds?  Here are a few local examples of how your elected officials are ignoring their constituents and hijacking democracy for tribalism and more gambling:

 

• 6.9 Acre fee-to-trust: BIA ignored 1000 people opposing this.

 

• Appeal of 6.9 of fee-to-trust:  County ignored over 1000 people and hours of public testimony begging them to appeal.

 

• Community request for resolution to Governor Schwarzenegger from Santa Barbara County opposing more slots until casino impact studies were completed.  County ignored 500 emails, 23 people testified.

 

• Letter to Governor on community concerns over 5000 more slots:  Sent only after the tribe reviewed and changed the letter.

 

• Casino impact studies approved by Supervisors in response to community concern:  CEO Mike Brown changed the approved motion for casino impact studies into the Santa Ynez Valley Greater Baseline Report.  This report had no mention of casino impact studies.  The community had to spend hours to figure what this report was.

 

• Chumash Highway bill by out-of-area assemblyman Joe Coto of San Jose, “based on a peer-reviewed study that demonstrated the profound historical significance of the 8,000 year old Chumash Trail network in the San Marcos Pass area” (letter to community member from “Paydro” Nava).  Apparently there was quite a lengthy process involved, yet none of the rest of us, or county government, knew about it.  How much did that study cost the taxpayers?

 

It’s time to take our government back.  Join P.O.L.O. in a round table discussion about the issues and what we can do to stop our elected representatives from selling out our Santa Ynez Valley for massive development.  Tues, Oct. 9, 2007, 7 p.m., St. Mark’s Church,
Los Olivos.