California air regulators adopt new global warming standards

Tribal gambling expansion issues: politicians play now, pay later

 

By now, every voter in California has received the beautiful brochure telling us all to support the four new Indian gaming compacts authorizing 22,500 more slot machines that are supposed to bring California $9 billion over the next 20 years.

This is the largest expansion of gambling in the history of the United States. The way the brochure is written, one would think this is “free” money. Governor Schwarzenegger looks so happy.

 

Who do those politicians, the ones who voted in support of this huge expansion of gambling, think they are kidding? 

Economic studies show that gambling is bad for the economy.  Study after study show that the people who gamble the most are the poor, the young, the elderly and the addicted. People living within 50 miles of a casino are the most affected.

Other economic studies show that the $9 billion the state is counting on receiving from these people’s losses isn’t even an accurate figure. It will be much less -- if Sacramento can even collect it. So far the state has only collected $27 million of the $1 billion promised after Schwarzenegger’s renegotiation of the compacts in 2004. 

 

Every politician who supports any expansion of tribal gambling must be held accountable, and should have to say, “I support taking money from the losses of the young, the elderly, the poor and the addicted.”

 

The losses to these most vulnerable people do not even take into account the multiple negative impacts to the surrounding communities.  Indian casinos are largely self-regulated. Gambling is a documented detriment to the surrounding community.   In the Santa Ynez Valley, we have seen a significant increase in crime that can be traced to the opening of the casino. Traffic has increased exponentially. Casino losers beg locals for money for gas to get home. The local hospital emergency room is impacted by people who have forgotten to eat, sleep or take their medication. 

 

And what about second–hand smoke? For some reason the health and welfare of the California public is so important that smoking is banned on some beaches. Casino patrons and employees are apparently not worthy of the same protection, and California’s indoor no-smoking regulations do not apply in many areas within those Alhambras. 

Who do we have to blame?

Our elected officials!  They are no longer representing the health and welfare of the people.  Their “play now” means pay later for California taxpayers. 

 

It’s time to take our government back.  In February 2008, vote ‘no’ on the compacts. Speak up and hold our representatives accountable. Their mantra of “there is nothing I can do about gambling expansion ... it is inevitable” is unacceptable and untrue.  There are dozens of countries around the world that have awakened to the economic strain of gambling on their economy and are shutting casinos down by the thousands.  Yet our politicians are expanding gambling.  What is wrong with this picture?