So much is being said about the immigration bill that’s working its way through Congress, that it’s hard to know where to be

  So much is being said about the immigration bill that’s working its way through Congress, that it’s hard to know where to begin.  Let me start by declaring that this legislation, as it is currently proposed, is just another example of the duplicity and dishonesty of our political elites, who believe they know what’s best for the people they supposedly serve.In a classic example of the maxim, “Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me,” our political leaders are once again promising something they either can’t or won’t deliver, which is control of our border with Mexico.  Unfortunately, we live in a culture that places a lower value on principle and honesty than it does on personal gain and political advantage, so it’s not surprising that our legislators are once again writing a major law that favors special interests, the people be damned. Jay Leno recently put the situation in perspective with the following comment:

  “The White House and key members from both houses of Congress have come to an agreement on an immigration bill. Now people from Mexico can finally come to this country and no longer go through all that red tape. ... The Associated Press says that many of the Mexican people in Mexico are against this new immigration bill. Oh, man. Let’s hope they don’t boycott coming here.” (Patriot Post, Vol 87 No. 21)

  If political pundits and activists on the Left can argue that America should get out of Iraq because it’s clear that’s what the public wanted when they gave the Democrats control of Congress, then why doesn’t the same logic apply to controlling our borders?  It’s just as clear that there is overwhelming support for preventing illegal immigrants from getting into the country, especially from Mexico, yet every proposal that is being put forth fails to satisfy this mandate.

  As usual, the debate is being distorted by extraneous arguments and name-calling, with those who are demanding that something be done about border control being called “racists” or “insensitive” to the plight of people who only come here because they want to work. 

 

A Side We Don’t Hear Much About

 

  There’s another issue involved that we don’t hear much about, and that’s trust.  The bill that has been working its way through the Senate is 1,000 pages long, yet it was only made available to the members of the Senate just one week before calling for a vote. 

 

  The Patriot Post reported the following commentary by John Fund (Wall Street Journal columnist): 

“It’s understandable that the White House and its Senate negotiating partners want to rush through the compromise immigration bill they agreed to Thursday. Supporters acknowledge that the delicately balanced legislation could collapse if a single destructive amendment is attached to it. Its sponsors admit they want to minimize the political debate. ‘We all know this issue can be caught up in extracurricular politics unless we move forward as quickly as possible,’ says Sen. John McCain, a key architect of the bill. But this is no way to debate the most sweeping change to our nation’s immigration laws in two decades—especially since the last comprehensive attempt, the Immigration Reform and Control Act, failed so spectacularly. The new bill is set to pass with much less analysis in the Senate than the 1986 law, known as Simpson-Mazzoli, had. Senators did not even receive the bill draft until midnight Saturday. After a test vote scheduled for today, Majority Leader Harry Reid is planning a final vote on the bill this Thursday, only one week after the compromise was struck. Shouldn’t senators have time to actually read the bill they’re being asked to vote on? ...Why the rush? Because, to be blunt, the senators don’t trust the American people to make sound judgments on such emotional issues as family reunification and national sovereignty.”

 

  So, if the leadership of the Senate doesn’t even trust their own members enough to allow them to weigh in on the legislation before bringing it up for a vote, what makes the public think it should know what’s in it before it is passed?

 

  The simple truth is that I don’t trust anyone in public office to do what they say they will, especially when I’m not even allowed to know the specifics of what they are doing and am not given sufficient time to review and react before they vote.  And, my sense is that the majority of the public feels the same way.

 

Some Quotes on the Subject

 

  The Patriot Post (May 23, 2007, Vol 87 No. 21) also offered the following observations:

“A ‘comprehensive’ plan doesn’t mean much if the government can’t accomplish one of its most basic responsibilities for its citizens — securing its borders. A nation without secure borders will not long be a sovereign nation.” — Fred Thompson (former Senator from TN).

 

“When we pass a bill that gives people the impression that there are new benefits to be had in the United States... you will have a stampede for the U.S. border that will overwhelm our border forces.” — Congressman Duncan Hunter (CA-R).

 

“Our country is unique because it opens its arms to immigrants from everywhere and gives them the chance to become citizens. If we start allowing ethnic groups to make claims on the Treasury because of where they were born, we’ll quickly lose the unity that makes our nation work.” — Ed Feulner, Ph.D. (President, Heritage Foundation).

 

“Today, all too many Americans feel like aliens in our own country—strangers in a strange land... They’re the second and third-generation Americans—whose ancestors came here legally, and learned our language, identified with our history and heritage, and were proud and grateful to call themselves Americans—who are now asked to press one if they wish to continue in English.” — Don Feder (Syndicated Columnist)

 

  I believe that most people want our borders secured first, before moving on to other concerns, such as a guest worker program.  They’re not against immigration or immigrants.  What they are against is illegal immigration, porous borders and people invading our country seeking opportunity and a better life, but breaking our laws to do it - and, receiving many of the privileges of citizenship once they are here, such as health care benefits, welfare, education of their children, etc.  It’s the cost, Stupid. 

  Immigration Facts (from ImmigrationCounters.com, May 23, 2007, Real-Time Data) summarizes some of the key numbers (rounded) associated with illegal immigration: 

 

§         Illegal Immigrants in U.S.: over 20 million.

§         Money Wired to Mexico since January 2006: over $30 billion.

§         Money Wired to Latin America since 2001: over $268 billion.

§         Cost of Social Services for Illegal Immigrants since 1996: over $397 billion

§         Children of Illegals in Public Schools: over 4 million.

§         Cost of Illegals in K-12 since 1996:  over $14 billion.

§         Illegal Immigrants Incarcerated: over 337,000

§         Cost of Incarcerations since 2001: over $1.4 billion

 

  At this writing, it appears that the immigration bill that is now in the Senate will pass, albeit by a slim margin, but that it will fail in the House, which will take us back to square one.  If Congress would listen to their constituents and do something real about border security first, they might be surprised to find that the public does not really oppose immigration, just uncontrolled immigration.

 

© 2007 Harris R. Sherline, All Rights Reserved