Scientists: Nothing to fear from
atom-smasher
MEYRIN,
Switzerland (AP) — The most powerful atom-smasher ever built
could make some bizarre discoveries, such as invisible matter or extra
dimensions in space, after it is switched on in August.
But
some critics fear the Large Hadron Collider could
exceed physicists’ wildest conjectures: Will it spawn a black hole that could
swallow Earth? Or spit out particles that could turn the planet into a hot dead
clump?
Ridiculous, say scientists at the European
Organization for Nuclear Research, known by its French initials CERN — some of
whom have been working for a generation on the $5.8 billion collider, or LHC.
“Obviously,
the world will not end when the LHC switches on,” said project leader Lyn
Evans.
David
Francis, a physicist on the collider’s huge ATLAS particle detector, smiled
when asked whether he worried about black holes and hypothetical killer
particles known as strangelets.
“If
I thought that this was going to happen, I would be well away from here,” he
said. The collider basically consists of a ring of supercooled
magnets 17 miles in circumference attached to huge barrel-shaped detectors.
The
ring, which straddles the French and Swiss border, is buried 330 feet
underground.
The
machine, which has been called the largest scientific experiment in history,
isn’t expected to begin test runs until August, and ramping up to full power
could take months. But once it is working, it is expected to produce some
startling findings.
Scientists
plan to hunt for signs of the invisible “dark matter” and “dark energy” that
make up more than 96 percent of the universe, and hope to glimpse the elusive
Higgs boson, a so-far undiscovered particle thought to give matter its mass.
The
collider could find evidence of extra dimensions, a boon for superstring
theory, which holds that quarks, the particles that make up atoms, are
infinitesimal vibrating strings.
The
theory could resolve many of physics’ unanswered questions, but requires about
10 dimensions — far more than the three spatial dimensions our senses
experience.
The safety of the collider, which will
generate energies seven times higher than its most powerful rival, at Fermilab near Chicago, has been debated for years. The physicist Martin
Rees has estimated the chance of an accelerator producing a global catastrophe
at one in 50 million — long odds, to be sure, but about the same as winning
some lotteries.
By
contrast, a CERN team issued a report in June concluding that there is “no
conceivable danger” of a cataclysmic event. The report essentially confirmed
the findings of a 2003 CERN safety report, and a panel of five prominent
scientists not affiliated with CERN, including one Nobel laureate, endorsed its
conclusions.
Critics
of the LHC filed a lawsuit in a Hawaiian court in March seeking to block its
startup, alleging that there was “a significant risk that ... operation of the
Collider may have unintended consequences which could ultimately result in the
destruction of our planet.”
One
of the plaintiffs, Walter L. Wagner, a physicist and lawyer, said Wednesday
CERN’s safety report, released June 20, “has several major flaws,” and his
views on the risks of using the particle accelerator had not changed.
U.S.
Justice Department lawyers representing the Department of Energy and the
National Science Foundation filed a motion June 24 to dismiss the case.
The
two agencies have contributed $531 million to building the collider, and the
NSF has agreed to pay $87 million of its annual operating costs. Hundreds of
American scientists will participate in the research.
The
lawyers called the plaintiffs’ allegations “extraordinarily speculative,” and
said “there is no basis for any conceivable threat” from black holes or other
objects the LHC might produce. A hearing on the motion is expected in late July
or August.
In
rebutting doomsday scenarios, CERN scientists point out that cosmic rays have
been bombarding the earth, and triggering collisions similar to those planned
for the collider, since the solar system formed 4.5 billion years ago.
And
so far, Earth has survived.
“The
LHC is only going to reproduce what nature does every second, what it has been
doing for billions of years,” said John Ellis, a British theoretical physicist
at CERN.
Critics
like Wagner have said the collisions caused by accelerators could be more
hazardous than those of cosmic rays.
Both
may produce micro black holes, subatomic versions of cosmic black holes —
collapsed stars whose gravity fields are so powerful that they can suck in
planets and other stars.
But
micro black holes produced by cosmic ray collisions would likely be traveling
so fast they would pass harmlessly through the earth.
Micro
black holes produced by a collider, the skeptics theorize, would move more
slowly and might be trapped inside the earth’s gravitational field — and
eventually threaten the planet.
Ellis
said doomsayers assume that the collider will create micro black holes in the
first place, which he called unlikely. And even if they appeared, he said, they
would instantly evaporate, as predicted by the British physicist Stephen
Hawking.
As
for strangelets, CERN scientists point out that they
have never been proven to exist. They said that even if these particles formed
inside the Collider they would quickly break down.
When
the LHC is finally at full power, two beams of protons will race around the
huge ring 11,000 times a second in opposite directions. They will travel in two
tubes about the width of fire hoses, speeding through a vacuum that is colder
and emptier than outer space.
Their
trajectory will be curved by supercooled magnets — to
guide the beams around the rings and prevent the packets of protons from
cutting through the surrounding magnets like a blowtorch.
The
paths of these beams will cross, and a few of the protons in them will collide,
at a series of cylindrical detectors along the ring. The two largest detectors
are essentially huge digital cameras, each weighing thousands of tons, capable
of taking millions of snapshots a second.
Each
year the detectors will generate 15 petabytes of
data, the equivalent of a stack of CDs 12 miles tall. The data will require a
high speed global network of computers for analysis.
Wagner
and others filed a lawsuit to halt operation of the Relativistic Heavy Ion
Collider, or RHIC, at the Brookhaven National Laboratory in New York state in 1999. The courts dismissed the suit.
The
leafy campus of CERN, a short drive from the shores of Lake Geneva, hardly
seems like ground zero for doomsday. And locals don’t seem overly concerned.
Thousands attended an open house here this spring.
“There is a huge army of scientists who know what they
are talking about and are sleeping quite soundly as far as concerns the LHC,”
said project leader Evans.