Phony
carbon offsets
Nothing exemplifies hypocrisy better than the behavior of
Al Gore in promoting his theories about global warming while, at the same time,
using more than 20 times the amount of energy at his home in Tennessee than the
average American.
After being criticized for his excessive personal use of
energy, Gore and his disciples pointed to his use of “carbon offsets” to
neutralize the impacts of his profligate ways, thereby keeping him pure, that
is, “carbon neutral.”
Writing in Human Events (“Al Gore’s Hypocrisy a High Cost
for Taxpayers”), Amanda B. Carpenter noted:
• “Carbon offsets” is an interesting sophistry that is
being used by Gore and others, generally well-to-do liberals, to offset their
own so-called “carbon footprint…”
• “A carbon offset service is one arranged with such a
provider, that achieves this net reduction through proxies who reduce their
emissions and/or increase their absorption of greenhouse gases. A wide variety
of offset actions are available; tree planting is the most common. Renewable
energy and energy conservation offsets are also popular, including emissions
trading credits.”
Commenting in his Junk Science column, “What’s Your Real
Carbon Footprint?” (May 11, 2006), Steven Milloy
noted:
• “The notion of a personal “carbon footprint” was
created by global warming alarmists to foster a sense of individual
accountability with respect to the consumption of energy produced by the
burning of coal, oil and natural gas. The idea is that the more energy from
these sources you use, the more carbon dioxide you cause to be released into
the atmosphere, thereby contributing to global warming.”
• “… you can purchase ‘off-sets’ from sellers who claim
they will use your money to neutralize or off-set your personal carbon dioxide
emissions — by planting trees or supporting wind/solar energy projects, for
example.”
• “You’ll still want to hold on to your wallets, though.
Those who seek to profit from the carbon footprint concept would have you
believe that calculating your [carbon dioxide] emissions is the first — and
last — step in discovering your impact on global temperature. But there’s much
more to it than that.”
• “… we calculate that the average U.S. household
contributes, at most, an infinitesimal 0.0000000000148 degrees Fahrenheit annually
to average global temperature — a trivial contribution even when multiplied by
the 100 million U.S. households.”
• “Moreover, the carbon off-set hucksters have created
such a price scale that if you wanted to purchase enough off-sets at the
low-end price of $5.50 per metric ton of carbon dioxide to potentially avoid
one degree Fahrenheit of warming based on the average household’s “carbon
footprint,” they would reap about $7.04 trillion. An off-set purchase price of
$30/Mt-CO2 makes the price of potentially
avoiding one degree Fahrenheit of warming — and their potential gross revenue —
a whopping $38.6 trillion.”
• “Land-based temperature data indicate that the average
global temperature increased about 0.07 degrees Celsius per decade during
1880-2005. In contrast, when ocean-based measurements are factored in, average
global temperature has increased by only 0.04 degrees Celsius per decade.”
• “As a by-product of developing The Real Carbon
Footprint Calculator, we calculated that to prevent one degree Celsius of
global warming, mankind would need to avoid emitting about 4 trillion metric
tons of CO2 — that would mean no manmade CO2
emissions for 120 years.”
In short, carbon offsets are just another ruse for
picking people’s pockets in the name of saving the planet. As far as I can
tell, there is no accountability for how much money is being generated by this
hustle or how it is spent. We hear about those caring souls who actually seem
to think they are doing something to improve the environment, especially when
it’s good for their public image, but we never hear anything at all about how
the money is used, who gets it and how much.
My sense is that it’s nothing more than another giant scam.
Unfortunately, the problem is the relentless pressure to
sell the idea to the public and our politicians, who may do something else
stupid, like passing a law or laws to make this foolishness mandatory, thereby
creating another huge tax.
The idea that we can actually reduce the total “carbon
footprint” of our society to zero is an amazing claim. Think about it. Suppose, as the
environmentalists urge, everyone in America paid to do this, would the amount
of CO2 in the atmosphere be any less than
it is now? Hardly.
The only result would be fatter wallets for the recipients of this largesse and
less money in the pockets of the donors.
© 2008
Harris R. Sherline, All rights
reserved. Read more of Harris Sherline’s commentaries
on his blog at http://www.opinionfest.com.