Playing cuttlefish with the budget
Abraham
Lincoln finally had had enough of Stephen Douglas’ obfuscations when they met
to debate in Charleston, Ill. He said, “Judge Douglas is playing cuttlefish – a
small species of fish that has no mode of defending himself when pursued except
by throwing out a black fluid which makes the water so dark the enemy cannot
see it, and thus it escapes.”
Lincoln’s
cuttlefish story came to mind during Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s State of the
State message when he blamed the state’s massive budget deficit on formulae
that locks in spending. On the same day, a gubernatorial minion penned a column
that claimed, “About 90 percent of the state’s budget is tied to spending
formulas, contracts and/or statutes, requiring spending to increase by specific
amounts each year.”
Behind
that cloud of sophistry is a species of politician trying to escape
responsibility for a budget crisis of his own making.
In
fact, virtually all of the “formulas, contracts and/or statutes” can be
suspended with the same two-third vote that is required to adopt the budget in
the first place. Our budget crisis isn’t because these politicians can’t
suspend these “mandates” – it’s because they won’t.
True,
there are a few expenditures required by the state constitution. The state’s
annual debt payments can’t be suspended, although less borrowing can reduce
them in the future. Unfortunately, Gov. Schwarzenegger’s borrowing binge has
increased our annual debt obligation from $2 billion in 2003 to more than $7
billion today.
The
state’s pension payments are contractual obligations that can’t be suspended,
but shrinking the public workforce or reforming pensions for new hires can
reduce future obligations. Unfortunately, under Schwarzenegger the state
employee rolls have grown at nearly twice the rate of population growth.
In
addition, there is one ballot proposition that is beyond the control of the
legislature and the governor to suspend: Arnold Schwarzenegger’s own After
School Program that now consumes roughly a half-billion dollars each year.
Everything
else can be suspended by the same vote that adopts the budget – including every
statute on the books. Even most constitutional mandates provide for their own
suspension. For example, Proposition 98, which “mandates” that nearly half of
the budget must go to public schools, can be suspended by two-third vote. Not
only did Schwarzenegger refuse to do so through the last three years of
declining public school enrollment, he increased the Prop. 98
base – and therefore future budgets – by billions of dollars above what Prop.
98 allowed. That is precisely why the governor is now forced to propose school
cuts that are far deeper than would otherwise have been necessary.
Similarly,
the state legislature can force virtually any contract back to the bargaining
table by refusing to fund it fully in the annual budget act. When Sen. Jackie Speier and I proposed doing so in 2004 in an attempt to
bring state prison guard salaries under control, Schwarzenegger opposed it.
Now, four years later, the governor proposes releasing 22,000 dangerous felons.
Perhaps
the most telling point is simply this: when Senate Republicans desperately
warned last summer that the budget was dangerously unbalanced and attempted to
enact reforms to avert the crisis, Gov. Schwarzenegger campaigned against them.
When
the budget was adopted last August, I warned on the Senate floor, “Today we set
in motion events that will require far more difficult and painful decisions
starting just five months from now in what is likely to be a much worse economy
… For the second time in a decade, this state is being driven to another Gray
Davis-sized fiscal crisis.”
The
same day, the governor said, “I am pleased that the legislature has passed a
responsible budget that protects California’s priorities and keeps our economy
strong. It was a challenging process but in the end our legislative leaders
came together to deliver a spending plan that does not raise taxes, creates the
largest reserve in history, and reduces our operating deficit after the
spending vetoes that I have promised.”
It’s
going to require more than a cloud of rhetorical ink to cover that escape.
Senator
Tom McClintock, R-Thousand Oaks, represents the 19th Senate District in the
California Legislature.